On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:56:03 +1100 Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith > <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=* > > As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all > considered subtags of the access tag. So, for consistency, it would be > caravan=no, just like it's foot=no, motorcar=no... > > Steve > > a complete subtag like caravan=no will cause misunderstandings with those highway tags which mark a cycleway as part of the way sample highway=secondary cycleway=lane caravan=no will the caravan=no belong on the cycleway or will it belong on the main way? however highway=secondary cycleway=lane access:highway:caravan=maybe would be clear. This discussion just informs us that the access tagging system has faults. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au