So those guys put out a legal statement and an employee even gave you his interpretation on this list, which you can cite in court if you want. I think you're pretty solid and it feels like people are just looking for problems no matter what is done or said. :-(
Steve stevecoast.com On Jun 16, 2011, at 0:44, Nick Hocking <nick.hock...@gmail.com> wrote: > My understanding is that Nearmap wish all contributions to OSM, by any mapper > who has agreed to the CT, derived from their imagery (before the 17th June > 2011) to be able to be relicenced by OSMF under any licence it (OSMF) chooses > at any time. > > However I also can't see exactly how the published statement meets this wish. > > Nick > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-t...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
