On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is why route numbers were invented. So routes can be followed across > multiple road names. The route numbers are on the ground, or otherwise > discoverable.
I'm not sure if we're disagreeing or not, but: assuming that there is an uncontroversial route number of some sequence of roads, then we should have a relation describing that same sequence of roads. ref=* tags on ways are ok; relations are better. Do you agree with that? Or are you contesting the actual value of relations? Steve _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
