(Sorry, forgot to cc the list) Wow, that wasn't that bad last time i looked though there.
They haven't even bothered to put in oneway tags and in at least one intersection, have created ways for every direction except straight through the intersection! Has anyone contacted them yet? If no-one beats me to it, i'll try and and do some correcting around there tonight. On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:55 PM, John Henderson <snow...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 27/11/11 11:59, Ross Scanlon wrote: > >> Just reading this: >> >> https://docs.google.com/a/**osmfoundation.org/document/**pub?id=** >> 1zMm5p70Hd6dalxte42DVCGAW-**C9Muy0pjHCZ8xWJT4w<https://docs.google.com/a/osmfoundation.org/document/pub?id=1zMm5p70Hd6dalxte42DVCGAW-C9Muy0pjHCZ8xWJT4w> >> >> >> While people still continue to map garbage like these > >> intersections: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?**lat=-37.882577&lon=145.276362&**zoom=18<http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-37.882577&lon=145.276362&zoom=18> >> >> then people will not want to use osm data at all. >> >> It's not immeditately apparent on the map but load it into josm or >> potlatch and look at all the non existant ways, reversed direction >> ways and just plain wrong ways. >> > > And lots of lanes entered as distinct ways (implying that one can't > change lanes), when it's a lane count that would be appropriate. > > What a mess. I'm tempted to put my Garmin GPS into simulation mode and > have it simulate various entry and exit combinations. But I already > know it'd be a dog's breakfast. > > If that was in my area I'd be inclined to fix it up and put in some note > tags explaining why. > > John H > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-au<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
