On 8 August 2012 02:14, Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 August 2012 22:54, Grant Slater <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: > >> >> Currently the 7 zones are stacked left to right. >> I quickly hacked up a right to left stack: >> http://agri.openstreetmap.org/?layers=0B0 >> tms url is: http://a.agri.openstreetmap.org/rtl/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png >> >> There are a few regions which are better but not a huge amounts. Some >> regions better, some worse. >> > > This is easy to work with in JOSM. Just load both layers, and click on and > off to get the best view. Is this additional layer going to stay? >
Sure, if it is useful then I see no need to remove it. >> >> >> My next task is working on the South African 0.5m colour imagery I >> received from the "Chief Directorate: National Geo-spatial >> Information" (South African national mapping agency). >> Maybe GeoScience Australia has similar imagery? > > > > Would be nice! :-) > > I notice the landsat imagery on at GA is also CC-BY in much the same way as > the AGRI imagery was (including the soon to be released landsat 8). > Although I don't think the resolution will be as good as AGRI, it could be > useful to check for change, etc. Is it possible to contact the same source > as before at GA, and confirm that they don't want any rights in data traced > from their other CC-BY imagery? > I believe the landsat imagery is fairly low resolution. 15m to 100m... Might still be useful, GA are going to be publishing daily updates. On the question, I suspect it will be the same case for their other CC-BY imagery in that they want the use of the imagery attributed but not worried about attribution on new works derived from the imagery. Happy to contact or forward contact details once there is a specific case. Regards Grant _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
