On 23/10/2012, at 11:09 AM, David Bannon wrote: > 1. Nathan sees all cases of highway=track implying 4x4 required. I don't > really agree, the dynamic range in this space is just too tight, we need to > use 'track' on roads that are both 4x4 and not 4x4. Thats what 4x4_only tag > is for. Whats the feeling here folks ?
Over the last few years I have added many tracks that are definitely drivable with a 2-wheel drive (the vast majority added using the GPS trace from my 2-wheel drive car). 4x4 required should definitely not be implied by highway=track. Mark P.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
