Hi,

I'm surprised you couldn't find some F3 signs there as well!

In any event, we can..

1. Ignore the new routes until they are completed.  Then re-reference the
road.
2. As soon as the route is confirmed and there are some signs, re-reference
the road
3. Adopt some new schema that allows us to have both route references at
once.
4. Adopt of hodge-podge approach, and reference partial roads, based on the
assessment/whim of the mapper concerned.

I originally proposed 1, but now I'm leaning towards 2, because I feel I'm
swimming against the tide.

I don't think we're capable of doing 3.  And I'd hate to end up with 4.

Ian.


On 10 May 2013 05:29, Ben Johnson <tangarar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I took a look there last weekend. As you say... inconsistencies everywhere.
>
> Northbound all are M1 with B74, and there's even a distance reassurance
> sign (not interchange-related) showing distances to Brisbane, titled "M1
> Pacific Mwy" which I was surprised to see.
>
> Southbound all are NR1 with B74.
>
> The signs at the top of the ramps are in odd combinations like NR1
> "Pacific Mwy" on one sign, and M1 "Freeway" on another...
>
> It's a real tourist attraction for sign geeks!
>
> BJ
>
> On 09/05/2013, at 22:11, Nathan Van Der Meulen <natvan...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > You're not going to win any way you change the route references.  On the
> ground, around the Tuggerah Interchange alone are references to Nat Route
> 1, M1, Pacific Motorway etc.  Note that the freeway is referenced as M1
> from Wyong Rd (B74) but on the freeway it's still NR1.  B74 only seems to
> be referenced at the interchange.  If you only edit as per what's on the
> ground, how do you edit that?
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On 03/05/2013, at 21:00, talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
> >
> >> Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
> >>   talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>   http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>   talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>   talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >>  1. Alphanumeric references in NSW (Ian Sergeant)
> >>  2. Re: Alphanumeric references in NSW (Ben Kelley)
> >>  3. Re: Alphanumeric references in NSW (Ian Sergeant)
> >>  4. Re: Alphanumeric references in NSW (Ben Johnson)
> >>  5. Re: Alphanumeric references in NSW (Ian Sergeant)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:07:02 +1000
> >> From: Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com>
> >> To: OSM - Talk-au <Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> >> Subject: [talk-au] Alphanumeric references in NSW
> >> Message-ID:
> >>   <CALDa4YLY+4KEnutrnBmjcRpE5z3G5hH4z6Yzyu=duwiw5sn...@mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've noticed a few people are changing the references in NSW to the
> >> alphanumeric references before the signage has changed.
> >>
> >> I don't see the purpose of this.  I doesn't correspond to what is on the
> >> ground, it must be confusing to people actually trying to use OSM for
> >> navigation.  Also, given it is the RTA coordinate this, it wouldn't be
> >> surprising if some of the routes actually differed from the proposed
> routes
> >> on the webpage.
> >>
> >> To the best of my knowledge the only route that has been re-referenced
> is
> >> the B73, the others still retain their existing signage - with perhaps
> an
> >> uncovered sign here and there.  I traced the
> >>
> >> I'd suggest we can use the wiki to coordinate as these references
> change?
> >> That way we can ensure the entire route is renamed at once, rather than
> a
> >> patchwork?
> >>
> >> Ian.
> >> P.S. Of course there have been a few routes (M7, A31/M31 approaching
> >> Albury) that have been this way for a while, and aren't at issue here.
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20130503/f593d5da/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:33:45 +1000
> >> From: Ben Kelley <ben.kel...@gmail.com>
> >> To: Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: OSM - Talk-au <Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Alphanumeric references in NSW
> >> Message-ID:
> >>   <CAE4-2TKPPKzjA3EE-kwfkDrH=8b-_by+h74hv3ytdgn+ajl...@mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I have seen a few A15 signs on the New England Highway, but there are
> still
> >> quite a few 43 and 15 signs along the route. The ground can still be a
> bit
> >> confusing.
> >>
> >> - Ben Kelley.
> >> On 3 May 2013 15:08, "Ian Sergeant" <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've noticed a few people are changing the references in NSW to the
> >>> alphanumeric references before the signage has changed.
> >>>
> >>> I don't see the purpose of this.  I doesn't correspond to what is on
> the
> >>> ground, it must be confusing to people actually trying to use OSM for
> >>> navigation.  Also, given it is the RTA coordinate this, it wouldn't be
> >>> surprising if some of the routes actually differed from the proposed
> routes
> >>> on the webpage.
> >>>
> >>> To the best of my knowledge the only route that has been re-referenced
> is
> >>> the B73, the others still retain their existing signage - with perhaps
> an
> >>> uncovered sign here and there.  I traced the
> >>>
> >>> I'd suggest we can use the wiki to coordinate as these references
> >>> change?   That way we can ensure the entire route is renamed at once,
> >>> rather than a patchwork?
> >>>
> >>> Ian.
> >>> P.S. Of course there have been a few routes (M7, A31/M31 approaching
> >>> Albury) that have been this way for a while, and aren't at issue here.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Talk-au mailing list
> >>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20130503/deaad936/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:47:02 +1000
> >> From: Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com>
> >> To: Ben Kelley <ben.kel...@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: OSM - Talk-au <Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Alphanumeric references in NSW
> >> Message-ID:
> >>   <calda4yjaebwhjfczgsmc2yqdevjtquorqlvok-mkwzjgxxg...@mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Agreed.
> >>
> >> I could see a strict "on-the-grounder" changing the ref for each road
> >> section :-)
> >>
> >> I've noticed Google Maps is using the A36 now for the Princes Hwy, but
> I've
> >> only seen one sign at Rockdale, so I still think it is too early to
> change
> >> the route in OSM, but I'm open to be convinced.
> >>
> >> But I think using the wiki to coordinate when a particular route has
> been
> >> referenced, and then we use old_ref to capture the previous route
> >> referencing.  Currently when I use skobbler to do navigation its ugly
> >> moving back and forth in references between the same road.
> >>
> >> Ian.
> >>
> >> On 3 May 2013 15:33, Ben Kelley <ben.kel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> I have seen a few A15 signs on the New England Highway, but there are
> >>> still quite a few 43 and 15 signs along the route. The ground can
> still be
> >>> a bit confusing.
> >>>
> >>> - Ben Kelley.
> >>> On 3 May 2013 15:08, "Ian Sergeant" <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've noticed a few people are changing the references in NSW to the
> >>>> alphanumeric references before the signage has changed.
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't see the purpose of this.  I doesn't correspond to what is on
> the
> >>>> ground, it must be confusing to people actually trying to use OSM for
> >>>> navigation.  Also, given it is the RTA coordinate this, it wouldn't be
> >>>> surprising if some of the routes actually differed from the proposed
> routes
> >>>> on the webpage.
> >>>>
> >>>> To the best of my knowledge the only route that has been
> re-referenced is
> >>>> the B73, the others still retain their existing signage - with
> perhaps an
> >>>> uncovered sign here and there.  I traced the
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd suggest we can use the wiki to coordinate as these references
> >>>> change?   That way we can ensure the entire route is renamed at once,
> >>>> rather than a patchwork?
> >>>>
> >>>> Ian.
> >>>> P.S. Of course there have been a few routes (M7, A31/M31 approaching
> >>>> Albury) that have been this way for a while, and aren't at issue here.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Talk-au mailing list
> >>>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20130503/616a9529/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 17:13:04 +1000
> >> From: Ben Johnson <tangarar...@gmail.com>
> >> To: Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: OSM - Talk-au <Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Alphanumeric references in NSW
> >> Message-ID: <c1b0a966-8138-40ea-852c-a8a56e55a...@gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> >>
> >> I agree this can be better coordinated, but not everyone uses or reads
> this list.
> >>
> >> I have a particular interest in these new routes? (don't ask).
> >>
> >> B74 is already majorly unveiled at the Tuggerah junction with M1 - so I
> turned B74 on in OSM.
> >> http://www.ozroads.com.au/NSW/Special/MAB/563.jpg
> >> http://www.ozroads.com.au/NSW/Special/MAB/558.jpg
> >>
> https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-vEehFafhUeo/UWnpzpBCuNI/AAAAAAAAALg/rKvL4389seo/s1600/IMG_3205.JPG
> >>
> >> We should expect large-scale coverplate removal any day now. RMS has
> been waiting until end of school holidays, and also I believe for the
> release of Sydway and UBD 2014 editions which apparently are now available
> with new route numbers? so I think we're about to see big changes fast. So
> brace yourselves.
> >>
> >> I'm going that way again tomorrow and will investigate B70 to see if
> there's any action there yet. I've created a few route relations for alphas
> in Central Coast and Newcastle region, but haven't set the ref tags yet
> until there is on-ground signage in place.  This will make it easier (when
> the signs are unveiled) to select an entire route in JOSM and add the ref
> tag.  If you agree with this method then I'm happy to volunteer to continue
> creating relations for the new routes.  I have 5 weeks holidays starting
> soon with plenty of spare time and I want to get back into contributing to
> the project.
> >>
> >> What should become of the old routes?  Should old_ref be retained,
> should old route relations remain?
> >>
> >> Regard hierachies - have we agreed that all A routes are Trunk, and all
> B routes are Primary?  Should former the "State" routes (e.g. SR83 Old
> Pacific Hwy from Gosford to Doyalson) currently assigned as a Primary road
> now be lowered to Secondary as it loses its route number.
> >>
> >> Happy to help out - but I don't want to step on toes.
> >>
> >> BJ
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 03/05/2013, at 3:07 PM, Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've noticed a few people are changing the references in NSW to the
> alphanumeric references before the signage has changed.
> >>>
> >>> I don't see the purpose of this.  I doesn't correspond to what is on
> the ground, it must be confusing to people actually trying to use OSM for
> navigation.  Also, given it is the RTA coordinate this, it wouldn't be
> surprising if some of the routes actually differed from the proposed routes
> on the webpage.
> >>>
> >>> To the best of my knowledge the only route that has been re-referenced
> is the B73, the others still retain their existing signage - with perhaps
> an uncovered sign here and there.  I traced the
> >>>
> >>> I'd suggest we can use the wiki to coordinate as these references
> change?   That way we can ensure the entire route is renamed at once,
> rather than a patchwork?
> >>>
> >>> Ian.
> >>> P.S. Of course there have been a few routes (M7, A31/M31 approaching
> Albury) that have been this way for a while, and aren't at issue here.
> _______________________________________________
> >>> Talk-au mailing list
> >>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >>
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20130503/fecea80f/attachment-0001.html
> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 5
> >> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 21:00:04 +1000
> >> From: Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com>
> >> To: Ben Johnson <tangarar...@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: OSM - Talk-au <Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Alphanumeric references in NSW
> >> Message-ID:
> >>   <CALDa4YJeiNJcD-J3a=ywgi_fl3nm97or+gqnkewwjxchlwu...@mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> >>
> >> On 3 May 2013 17:13, Ben Johnson <tangarar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> We should expect large-scale coverplate removal any day now. RMS has
> been
> >>> waiting until end of school holidays, and also I believe for the
> release of
> >>> Sydway and UBD 2014 editions which apparently are now available with
> new
> >>> route numbers? so I think we're about to see big changes fast. So brace
> >>> yourselves.
> >> If you're fairly confident, I would be happy to live with the new
> >> references a few weeks in advance, if that's what we decide.  It is
> >> primarily just the hotch-potch I'd like to avoid.
> >>
> >> What should become of the old routes?  Should old_ref be retained,
> should
> >>> old route relations remain?
> >>
> >> I think where it is easy to retain the old_ref during the transition we
> >> should.  However, these routes have changed so many times, and we don't
> >> currently have the schema to retain every variation old route, so I see
> it
> >> just as a transitional thing.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Regard hierachies - have we agreed that all A routes are Trunk, and
> all B
> >>> routes are Primary?  Should former the "State" routes (e.g. SR83 Old
> >>> Pacific Hwy from Gosford to Doyalson) currently assigned as a Primary
> road
> >>> now be lowered to Secondary as it loses its route number.
> >>
> >> I think reflects our current agreement.  And finally we'll be able to
> have
> >> a deterministic algorithm at least for trunk and primary.
> >>
> >> I imagine the RMS in their wisdom are going to call the Hume south of
> >> Berrima the A31, rather than M31, so we'll have to make a call on
> whether
> >> we keep that as motorway.  I'd personally be in favour of doing so.
> >>
> >> Ian.
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20130503/4696a56f/attachment.html
> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-au mailing list
> >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >>
> >>
> >> End of Talk-au Digest, Vol 71, Issue 2
> >> **************************************
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-au mailing list
> > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to