On 16/12/2015 21:58, Warin wrote:
On 17/12/2015 8:35 AM, Ben Kelley wrote:
Use is not consistent.
Situation normal.
(If you harvest the natural trees, which one is it?)
forestry.
See the Forest page on the wiki,
The http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest page describes 4 different
approaches, and unfortunately because of the different approaches
someone consuming the data will struggle beyond "here be trees" for any
of them. As I understand it that's why the approach of the OSM
"Standard Style" is what it is (though there's no reason for mappers to
try and capture more detail though).
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
