On 13-Dec-17 10:08 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On 13 December 2017 at 09:31, Philip Mallis <phi...@philipmallis.com
<mailto:phi...@philipmallis.com>> wrote:
I have been considering how to tag parks that allow dogs to be
off-lead. I’ve had a look through the discussion on a proposed
feature on OSM Wiki but there doesn’t appear to be a useful
consensus
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Key:Dog
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Key:Dog>.
Does anyone have ideas or a precedent on how to proceed for an
Australian context?
The wiki indicates that
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddog_park is the tag
for this.
> leisure=dog_park
> A designated area, with or without a fenced boundary, where
dog-owners are permitted to exercise their pets unrestrained
I've used this for both
1. dedicated fenced off areas designed for dogs like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429999094.
2. an existing feature which permits dogs off leash like leisure=pitch
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205137157 overlapping the way for
leisure=dog_park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457196449
I think for the (2) type that's a good way to map as the area is
sometimes a sports field and sometimes a dog park based on the time of
day.
I'd be inclined to map;
the pitch as an area - the playing area
any barrier as a way - probably larger than the playing area
the dog facility as a node.
This would give the renders a fair chance of making a sensible display?
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
