According to the wiki, railway=station areas start at the entrance signal from the perspective of the train, not the passenger, so based on that, the area would enlarge.
However I wouldn't have though this entrance signal has any correlation to the cadastral parcels, which is what it seems you're proposing? Do you have any knowledge that indicates it does? I thought the parcels which make up the rail corridor were arbitrary and internal boundaries don't represent anything. PS. If you're planning on importing cadastre, I'd appreciate a few dot points on your plan, so the community has some visibility. On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 22:07, Sebastian Spiess <mapp...@consebt.de> wrote: > This is follow on from the previous discussion about the Sydney train > station. > > The Berry station (public_transport=station) is currently outlined by > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678867487 > > Thanks to the meet up last weekend I was introduced to QGIS and the NSW > data source. > > If I import the areas of each plot of land the train station is quite a > big area. See the screenshot here: https://prnt.sc/n6cg12 > > My question is now should the complete area be tagged landuse=railway > AND railway=station which is how I understand the wiki when using an > area, > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#A_Simple_Railway_Station > > What are your thoughts? > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
