On 07/10/19 19:57, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I added this to the ATG as amenity=community_centre +
community_centre:for=man,
'man' may mean both men and women. On the other hand it maybe the
original use was for males only. I think the value is not good.
There are only 4 uses of the community_centre:for=man in the data base.
I would prefer a different value... with a clear meaning.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Tagging_Guidelines&type=revision&diff=1856025&oldid=1855758.
Not saying we need to follow, this if the discussion leads elsewhere
it can be updated.
To me it seems more like a community centre for men than a club.
I don't think this warrants it's own tag.
Since there's a wikipedia page, there's a wikidata tag, I wonder if we
should use operator:wikidata or brand:wikidata to link these all together?
brand rather than operator? I am not certain where the funding comes
from, some from members contributions.
I'd think each shed has some control over their operations .. so tagging
the operator might give the wrong impression?
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com
<mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As per the title, what do we call a Men's Shed?
https://mensshed.org/ in case any of our overseas followers don't
know what we're talking about!
I'm guessing club=?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club but what?
Not really a community centre?
Maybe craft=?, possibly =handicraft?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Acraft%3Dhandicraft
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Graeme
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
