I would like to confirm that the inclusion of qualifiers such as "closed" or "freight only" in the name is NOT appropriate.
e.g. railway=station name = xxxxxx (closed) or railway=station name=xxxxxxx (freight only) I understand both are inappropriate uses of the name tag and should not be used. I think the first should be tagged as disused or abandoned such as disused:railway=station name=xxxxxxxx and the second with railway=yard name=xxxxxxx Is that generally agreed? What about a former railway station that is now freight only. Can one combine disused:railway=station and railway=yard on the one node or should there be multiple nodes? On Sat, 19 Oct 2019, at 6:53 AM, Ewen Hill wrote: > > Hi, > I am trying to get some clarity about tagging old railway stations like > https://i1.wp.com/judithsalecich.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The-former-Bogantungan-Railway-Station.jpg?ssl=1 > that has not seen a train stop for a numbe of decades > > > There appears to be a myriads of ways to tag this according to the Wiki. What > is the best standardised approach (which I will add to the ATG) > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
