I disagree with this one 1. I'm pretty sure they are not intended to have any effect to cyclists and pedestrians. Who are generally encouraged to use these kinds of streets. I wouldn't like to think we're putting access restrictions that are going to cause walking/cycling routing issues.
2. I'm also not sure these signs have any legal effect at all. They aren't privately owned. The signs are just street decorations. I'd be inclined to Ian. On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 22:36, Nemanja Bračko <brack...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would agree with David on this. > In that way you will avoid routing thru these streets unless your > destination is there. > > Sent from my phone > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 12:33 David Wales <daviewa...@disroot.org> wrote: > >> I would use access=destination >> >> On 7 November 2019 10:21:26 pm AEDT, Sebastian Spiess <mapp...@consebt.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello List, >>> >>> how do you map a 'local traffic only' sign as this one? >>> https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/FkY8gmlGX2NmhUARyveMQw >>> >>> Following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access states "...Note >>> that "access only for residents" is private..." >>> >>> Would this not break navigation in apps etc? >>> ------------------------------ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
