Thanks all, Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79209273
On 5/1/20 9:15 pm, Warin wrote: > There are some 944 of them in the data base .. so they should be > documented. > > I'd be pleased to add a few more, along with the suggested tags. > > On 05/01/20 21:02, Andrew Harvey wrote: >> Okay with me though it would be good if that tag was documented >> at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building >> >> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 20:15, Sebastian S. <mapp...@consebt.de >> <mailto:mapp...@consebt.de>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Similar to schools the building should be tagged >> >> building=fire_station >> >> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fire_station >> >> >> On 5 January 2020 4:55:26 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey >> <andrew.harv...@gmail.com <mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Yes, this >> is >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM_element, >> there should only be one amenity=fire_station for a single >> fire station. >> >> Where possible I prefer to trace the site boundary as this >> can be useful information and put all the tags on that, and >> then just have a way inside it with building=yes an none of >> the fire station tags. >> >> But I think it's also fine to just have a node, or to just >> have the building without the site as interim solutions or >> for fire stations where the extent is just the building which >> don't have a yard. >> >> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 15:27, David Wales >> <daviewa...@disroot.org <mailto:daviewa...@disroot.org>> wrote: >> >> Somewhat related to this. >> >> Camden West Rural Fire Service has both a traced >> building, *and* a traced site border. >> Both are currently tagged with amenity=fire_station. >> >> The building has the rest of the identifying tags. >> >> I feel that it makes sense to only have one feature >> tagged with amenity=fire_station, and the rest of the >> tags. Should this be the building, or the site border? >> >> See link below: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=724460466#map=20/-34.05818/150.67674 >> >> Regards, >> David Wales >> >> On 4/1/20 2:39 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: >>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Sebastian Spiess >>> <mapp...@consebt.de <mailto:mapp...@consebt.de>> wrote: >>> >>> Andrew, >>> I've done one. Just clarifying regarding the branch. >>> >>> branch = Narrabeen Fire Station >>> name = Fire and Rescue NSW Station 068 Narrabeen >>> >>> >>> I can't see clearly from Mapillary what the singe looks >>> like, but branch should be just "Narrabeen", without the >>> "Fire Station" words. Then you could still have >>> name=Narrabeen Fire Station. >>> >>> >>> Is this how you suggested? Before the branch tag was >>> the name. >>> >>> I've also added >>> building = fire_station >>> >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79179815 >>> >>> >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
