Sorry I'm a little slow to respond to this question. I have been thinking about it. particularly in the context of a similar property that I mapped a few years ago. I had previously tagged it as a social_facility but that is not correct.
Upon reflection, I have changed the tags for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313767655 This is a fenced and gated community for residents aged 50+. I think the area is zoned similar to a caravan park so that residents lease the land but provide their own demountable buildings and do not necessarily have secure tenure in the location. I have now tagged it as : access=private addr:street=Majestic Drive addr:suburb=Stanhope Gardens barrier=fence landuse=residential min_age=50 name=Gateway Lifestyle Stanhope Gardens old_name=Parklea Garden Village operator=Gateway Lifestyle place=neighbourhood residential=leasehold_only source:name=survey website=https://www.gatewaylifestyle.com.au/community/stanhope-gardens Any feedback or comments welcome On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, at 11:34 AM, Sebastian Spiess wrote: > Hi all, > > is a Over 55’s Lifestyle Village (like this one > https://www.middlerockhomevillage.com.au) a amenity=retirement_home? > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dretirement_home > > I'm not clear if the Lifestyle Village is only a fancy marketing name or > not. I've seen such villages and some are past caravan parks that have > been re-purposed with the over 55's as clientel. > > How would you tag this? > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
