I agree with Warin. On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, at 12:58 AM, Warin wrote: > On 18/6/20 6:48 pm, Little Maps wrote: > > Many thanks Warin, that seems much more variable in Vic, esp in Gippsland > > where natural=wood is a common tag for areas tagged as State Forests. > > Plantations in SW Vic are quite a mix. I wonder if it’s worth adding a > > section to the Aus tagging guidelines page to specify a preferred usage for > > landuse=forest and natural=wood, and perhaps other vegetation tags? I’d be > > happy to draft some text if more seasoned mappers were happy to comment and > > edit it. Thanks again Ian > > > Tread here carefully Little Maps! > > > I would like to see the following use: natural=wood for areas of trees. > Note the key 'natural' applies to both natural and man altered areas. > landuse=forest for areas that are maintained by humans to obtain tree > produce e.g. timber. Note these areas usually have trees, but after > harvest may have no trees. > Note there may be some who disagree with this, see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest. I would be interested to > here of any Australians who disagree with the above, and why they > disagree. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
