On 4/7/20 9:24 am, Ewen Hill wrote:
Good morning,
You may still travel through these zones to get to your
destination. Trains, trams and buses stil ply the routes so extensibly
nothing has altered.
True for urban areas. I think these would change far too fast for
usefulness in OSM.
Some 'aboriginal areas' have had Convid entering restrictions. I don't
know if that continues. Some of these have permit requirements for
visitors anyway, so that is a more useful thing to tag/map.
Ewen
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020, 11:58 PM Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org
<mailto:frede...@remote.org>> wrote:
Hi,
On 03.07.20 15:46, Bren Barnes wrote:
> Perhaps more of a thought experiment at this time, but how would
> "restricted postcodes" interact with OSM routing? Example:
>
> boundary=administrative
> name=brooklyn
> access:covid19=private
> or?
> opening_hours:covid19=restricted @ (Jul 02-Jul 29)
>
> I'm just wondering if any current OSM routing software would
utilise the
> tags on a relation which is bounding a lockdown area?
Sounds more like a task for a routing engine that supports "avoid
areas", e.g. ORS. With a little coding you could build a version
of that
that would always draw on the latest list of blocked areas without
having to mirror day-to-day policy changes in OSM.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org
<mailto:frede...@remote.org> ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
