On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 13:59, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 09:57, <m...@diacritic.xyz> wrote: > >> Thanks Andrew, >> >> I’ve reached out to the user on a changeset, and will hopefully have a >> good conversation about it. >> > There's a good chance they won't respond, but best to still give them the > chance, if you don't hear back and there's no further objection to > re-mapping these based on the split way only where physically separated, > then you can go ahead and correct them on the map. If they continue to > replace things based on their style, without responding to your attempts to > raise concerns and there is consensus here that their mapping is harmful, > then it can be raised through DWG as a last resort. > They have in the past replied to me quring one of their edies in question. Changeset: 108100471 | OpenStreetMap <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108100471#map=17/-37.88434/145.27924&layers=N> > >> In the meantime, I’ve found about 30-50 intersections with these >> duplicate ways and lanes. Would it be useful to add notes, or fix me tags >> to those intersections? I’m wary about flooding any feedback channels with >> many instances of the same problem, but it could help keep track of where >> work is needed? >> > > You could do either. Personally I usually reserve notes for when I need > something checked on the ground, but notes can be used as you've suggested > here. > >> _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
