A rather epic discussion on the topic can be found here: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/2816
Simon PS: wondering why Gruyere has that name. Am 05.11.2021 um 07:53 schrieb cleary:
Ideally suburbs would have a relation for the boundary PLUS a node for the "label node" as part of the relation. I'm not so familiar with Victorian locations, but this example for South Albury in NSW is an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5901488 Where there is a boundary and a separate place node, I would add the place node to the relation and its role would be "label node". On Fri, 5 Nov 2021, at 2:15 PM, Dian Ågesson wrote:Hey all, I would appreciate the thoughts of the community with regards to suburb representations. In a recent change set (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113355648) a node was introduced for Gruyere. Gruyere is on the urban boundary, but is technically in Metropolitan Melbourne. As such, it straddles the border between what could be considered a bona fide suburb, and an independent town. Mick has correctly pointed out that many of the other localities in the area are represented by both an area and a node. Is this the way all suburbs should be represented? Or is it an urban/rural distinction? Dian _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
