CC BY has fundamental issues that are widely ignored, the blog post is simply the diplomatic summary that we hammered out together with CC (it says so much in the text).
Simon Am 01.12.2021 um 07:54 schrieb Brendan Barnes:
Hey John,The Legal Eagles of the OSMF Licence Working Group continue to ask for explicit permission (ie waiver) for CC BY 4.0. The rationale is at https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/You can reach them via their contact details at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group for any clarifications, but it appears they have already assessed the wording in CC BY 4.0.I know waivers can be difficult to obtain, and government entities may have internal red tape or few resources available to supply one to the OSM community. However it's in everyone's best interest, and once we have a waiver on file for the agencies' datasets, they are good to use indefinitely...Brendan On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 15:53, John Luan <john.lua...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Guys, Had a look at this license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en Do we really need a waiver from the data provider? something like this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/1/17/AADC_CC-BY_Permission_JK_signed.pdf My feeling is that as long as we list the data provider on the contributor list, it should be fine. Regards, John _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
