I feel comfortable using the unit number as in the examples above. But I feel it gets more in the weed's when it comes to letters, such as "32a example Street" where I would probably not use the unit tag. What are your thoughts?
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Ben Kelley <ben.kel...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 8:37:59 AM To: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Is addr:housenumber=2/20 likely to be valid? In answer to your question though, yes "1/50 Example St" notation is quite common. It is probably well understood, although not universally used. "Unit 1, 50 Example St" is also used, as is "U 1 50 Example St". These would all be tagged as: addr:unit=1 addr:housenumber=50 - Ben. On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 03:51, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>> wrote: I want to confirm report from https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4196 "In my area (and throughout built-up parts of Australian cities in general) it is not uncommon to encounter blocks of townhouses which share a primary address number but have distinct sub-address numbers. The complete address numbers of such houses are written in the format <sub>/<primary>, eg "1/50", "2/50", "3/50" for the first three houses sharing the primary address site "50 Example St"." Is it accurate? Is addr:housenumber=1/50 the standard and preferred solution in such cases? -- Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com<mailto:ben.kel...@gmail.com> https://mrebenezer.blogspot.com/ This message was sent on my Atari 400
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
