Ben Laenen wrote: > Pierre Parmentier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > To follow the idea of Alain Empain, I have prepared a draft with some > > guidelines about the subject. > > > > See my user page : > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Foxandpotatoes ... and > > comment! > > How are the paths signed in the wood? Do they use regular traffic signs, or > are there special signs? In the latter case, could you make a list of all > the signs first? It often makes it easier to make tagging rules when you > have a list of signs. > > highway=cycleway is for example something which has to be used carefully, > because it would allow mopeds as well. There's also no rule that says that > cyclists could go on a highway=bridleway.
btw, I assume that the Flemish part of the Zoniënwoud is making use of the signs that are used in most woods in Flanders (rectangular signs with mostly green symbols, which also mention "Besluit Vlaamse Regering 22/07/1993"). So it makes sense to generalize the discussion. I'm not familiar with the rules in Brussels or Wallonia, so someone should work that out as well. About those Flemish signs: * most (or should I say: almost all) signs you see today are of the old kind, and can be seen here: http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/1999/03/20_2.pdf (page 59) * new signs were recently introduced in a new law which replaces the old regulation. http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2009/02/04_1.pdf (page 126 for the signs, the entire regulation about accessibility can be found on the pages before). It also redefines the old signs. So, "all" we now have to do is putting tags to all those signs for paths in a way which wouldn't conflict with tags used on public roads, and the Flemish part of the Zoniënwoud should be covered :-) Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
