2012/1/20 <talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org>:> - Als we straten maar verwijderen net voor we de nieuwe er op zetten, om> voorgaande problemen op te lossen, dan bestaat het gevaar dat we de oude> OSM data gebruiken om die opnieuw er op te zetten (wat ons in een> twijfelachtige situatie brengt qua copyright. Ik wil zeker tegenstanders> van ODBL geen reden geven om OSM aan te klagen)
Jo, do you mean that I need to prove that I actually was in a certain street before I can remove and remap it ? Do you still have all data (on paper, gps track, photo, etc.) of everything that you ever mapped ? What about landuse ? This is always mapped from satellite images ( I assumue). So why should one wait until it disappeared before mapping it again ? An example is the Lippelobos (close to Lippelo - what a surprise ;-) ) I know it's called Lippelobos, I've been there before, so I can remove the current area, and use Bing satellite images to remap it. But you say I have to wait until it's actually gone ? What about streets that I've passed when I surveyed for the knooppunten ? I did not write down the name of the streets because they were there. If I had known they would we lost, I would have noted them down. It's also easier when I delete/re-add the streets now than loose them and my own mapping work above them. regards m _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be