I think anyone can remove them. Of course, it would be better to also contact whoever added them, so they do not make the same "mistake" again.
Osmose seems to be "rather stupid", and decides that if x number of objects has certain tag combinations, all objects that have one of the tags, should also have the others. It does not verify if the tag is appropriate for the object (node, way, relation). But it is still a valuable tool. So feel free to remove the route=bicycle if you have the time regards m On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:45 AM, André Pirard Papou < a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2013-03-22 21:32, Marc Gemis wrote : > > This is the reply I got on my "bug report" to osmose. > > Do we have to locate those ways with route=bicycle ? > > m > > > It makes no sense. > route=bicycle is a tag for a relation, not for a way. > It's very surprising that Osmose commands to repeat such a tag on ever > cycling way !!! > How could we identify a cycling route if all the cycling ways contained > route=bicycle ???????? > > Either Osmose removes that test. > Or the authors remove that tag (I bcc: one of them). > Or I can remove 28 of them that I have ready after my selection. > > Your choice? > > Cheers, > > André. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: frodrigo <notificati...@github.com> > Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:12 PM > Subject: Re: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with > bicycle = yes (#1) > To: osm-fr/osmose-backend <osmose-back...@noreply.github.com> > Cc: marcgemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> > > > "Missing parent tag" is a statistical analysis. Osmose suggest to add > route=bicycle because this tag value is already a key as bicycle=yes, and > more over because there is more than 50 ways with route=bicycle + > bicycle=yes in Belgium. > > Maybe we need to apply this analysis on relative value inside of just 50. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on > GitHub<https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/issues/1#issuecomment-15319079> > . > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing > listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
