On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:20:07PM +0200, Glenn Plas wrote: > Vandaag volgende tegengekomen: > > http://nominatim.openstreetmaps.org/reverse.php?format=json&lat=50.9420900&lon=4.7305583&zoom=18&addressdetails=1&email=gl...@byte-consult.be&accept-language=nl,en;q=0.8,fr;q=0.5 > > resultaat: > > {"place_id":"12246533","licence":"Data \u00a9 OpenStreetMap > contributors, ODbL 1.0. > http:\/\/www.openstreetmap.org\/copyright","osm_type":"node","osm_id":"1156867059","lat":"50.9424155","lon":"4.7310233","display_name":"Station, > Stationsstraat, Rotselaar, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Vlaanderen, > 3012KA, Belgi\u00eb, European > Union","address":{"bus_stop":"Station","road":"Stationsstraat","city":"Rotselaar","county":"Leuven","state":"Vlaanderen","postcode":"3012KA","country":"Belgi\u00eb","country_code":"be","continent":"European > Union"}} > > Daar komt als postcode uit: 3012KA
Looking at postal codes, it seems most of them are wrong and not tagged? You probably now get whatever is closest by? The only information I can find now is the place= nodes, which ussually have openGeoDB:postalcode, and sometimes also postalcode. Does it make sense to move that information to relations instead? I guess they ussually fall together with administrative boundaries. But I'm not sure about cities that have multiple postcal codes. Kurt _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
