And I'm not the only one: see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_Features/Multiple_addresses none of the comments was in favor of this proposal.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2013/10/21 Pierre Parmentier <pierrecparment...@gmail.com> > >> Proposed Features/Multiple >> addresses<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Multiple_addresses> > > > > I don't like this proposal too much. This is a relation in disguise. So > why not use a real relation instead ? A building relation (which already > exists) with multiple address node members. -- I know it's not your > proposal, so I won't shoot the messenger :-) > This is a mess to maintain if you have to manually make sure that all > numbers behind a addr: are there. I would vote against it. > > m. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
