On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:30 PM, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Usually, hiking routes are designed to be walked in a single direction > (the signs are not well visible in the other) and that can be stressed with > oneway=yes. Que ? Are you placing oneway=yes on footpaths ? Since a walking route is something on-top of existing paths, it is wrong to add oneway on the path. One can take the path in the other direction when one does not follow the signposted route. By putting oneway=yes on the path you just block that possibility for a navigation device. This would be the same as putting a oneway=yes on a street, just because a bus route is only going in one direction through that street, while it is a two-way street. One of the relation pages you mention links to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route where the roles of the members are explained. Forward & backward are mentioned there. One can also use http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation to verify the correctness of a relation. Fill in the number (4225213 from Andrés example) regards m
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
