"It's useless to draw two "ways" for a single double-track railroad line":
almost everywhere all tracks are mapped seperately"to not use a detailed schema
for complex station grids": all detail is mapped in most stations"When on a
four track group of lines - and this is the case on L36/L36N between Leuven and
Brussels - the two inner tracks are another line than the two outer ones, I
propose to nevertheless draw them next to each other, nicely parallel as
prescribed in the "How to draw a motorway" page.": can it become more outdated?
And what about the voltage, frequency, gauge, usage, ref, name, ... tags? Which
tags should be used in Belgium, which not, en which values should they have?
And what about the relations and the tags they should have?
Also this page could use some
rewriting...http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Railways
Regards,
Stijn
From: Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be>
To: Stijn Rombauts <stijnromba...@yahoo.com>; OpenStreetMap Belgium
<talk-be@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Railway data accuracy , age and origin
What is wrong with it? most what I see looks still up to date. Could
you be more specific ?
Glenn
On 12-01-15 19:51, Stijn Rombauts wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea then to give this page a decent update so
> everybody knows how railways should be tagged:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Railways
> Otherwise it is very well possible that someone else will 'destroy' a
> lot of your work.
>
> Regards,
>
> StijnRR
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
