> Pascal's tool has a bug, but an interesting one. If two place nodes are > in the exact same place, one of them is picked up as an unmapped place > for some reason. I guess Pascal's process somehow only allows roads to > be picked once. > While that is a bit silly, it does identify duplicate place nodes. > > As you seem to already have found out :) > (but I wrote this while you were writing your second mail) > > And yes, deleting that extra node without the relation is the easiest > solution. In some cases, the duplicate might have some meaningful tags. > Marc, I don't see any specialist knowledge required, as long as you keep > the node that's in a relation.
Indeed, I had deducted all of this already ;-) : Since he's reporting the one with the relation as a problem (but that one is correct), So I removed the other node. Of course tags need to be checked, but this one was duplicated about 7 years ago so it was simple to remove it , no merging required. So his tool does exact coordinate matches somewhere. My best guess... The one he reports : http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2573424356 The one I deleted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/332227169/history Glenn _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
