De fietsparking op de foto is gemapped [1] amenity=bicycle_parking bicycle_parking=stands capacity=10 covered=no fee=no
genoeg detail ? :-) [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424058482 On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Philippe Casteleyn <philippecastel...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Ik vind fietsparkings belangrijk. > Alhoewel het er naar mijn zin te veel zijn om zelf te mappen en ze wel > ergens in een database moeten staan. > > Bij een tweede passage fotografeer ik ze wel. > > Ph Casteleyn > Dahliastraat 16 > 2800 Mechelen > animals.slippers.loaders > gsm 0486 516261 > Ctrl+v > > >> From: talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org >> Subject: Talk-be Digest, Vol 103, Issue 2 >> To: talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:50:05 +0000 >> >> Send Talk-be mailing list submissions to >> talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> talk-be-ow...@openstreetmap.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Talk-be digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? >> (Gerard Vanderveken) >> 2. Re: What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? (Marc Gemis) >> 3. Re: What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? (Jo) >> 4. Re: What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? (Marc Gemis) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:53:36 +0200 >> From: Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu> >> To: OpenStreetMap Belgium <talk-be@openstreetmap.org> >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-be] What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? >> Message-ID: <577667d0.4080...@ghia.eu> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed >> >> Hi, >> >> Checking on the map, learns me that most items are already thoroughly >> mapped (street cabinets, bins, advertising, lanes, crossings,...) >> Things lacking, but not derivable from the photo are the division of >> buildings and the corresponding addresses of the buildings. >> IMO addresses are of more importance then the little street furniture >> and should get more priority in mapping. >> Not meaning, that I don't appreciate these mappings, every added object >> counts! >> >> When you have lot of time, you could also map the separated footwalk and >> bicycle paths, but this is advanced stuff, and I don't recommend it, as >> it is not so easy to make a correct separation and have all options for >> connections and resulting in no foot etc on the main highway itself, so >> that routing programs for bike and foot will always select the correct >> paths. If not done well, it makes more clutter then making things real >> or clear. >> It seems these paths are already good and sufficient tagged in the map. >> >> So, in short, at first sight, not much extra to map from the photo. >> (I assume the sign to TIA is simply a direction and not part of a >> (tourist) route, which would imply a missing relation for some bicycle >> route/network) >> >> Regards, >> Gerard. >> >> Marc Gemis wrote: >> >> >I wonder whether we could learn to see/map more by looking at each >> >other's survey pictures. Would it allow novices to "see more" ? Let's >> >try out >> >I know the mailing list does not allow to include pictures, so you >> >have to do it with a link >> > >> >What could/would you map when you look at [1] ? What would you >> >investigate further ? >> > >> >Feel free to answer in French/German/English or Dutch >> > >> >p.s. Feel free to look at the other pictures at the site [2] and map >> >anything you want :-) Under the picture you'll find a (i) which shows >> >a map when you click it >> > >> > >> >---- Nederlands ---- >> > >> >Ik vraag me af of we van elkaar kunnen leren als we kijken naar de >> >foto's die we maken tijdens een survey ? Zou het helpen om >> >(beginnende) mappers meer te leren zien ? Laat ons het eens >> >uitproberen. Jammer genoeg laat de mailing list niet toe om foto's toe >> >te voegen, dus moet je het met een link stellen >> > >> >Wat zou je kunnen mappen, of wat map je gewoonlijk als je [1] bekijkt >> >? Wat zou je van nader bij gaan bekijken ? >> > >> > >> >p.s. Het staat je vrij om naar de andere foto's op de site [2] te >> >kijken en om het even wat te mappen dat je erop ziet :-) Onder de foto >> >staat een (i), als je daarop klikt, zie je een kaartje. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >[1] >> > https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g/0/O/DSC_3228.jpg >> >[2] gallery: >> > https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Talk-be mailing list >> >Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:31:46 +0200 >> From: Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> >> To: OpenStreetMap Belgium <talk-be@openstreetmap.org> >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-be] What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? >> Message-ID: >> <cajkjx-sf5kbs2i4z_bgyryqdywrmcn9uqtn3xifrdeom6qq...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> I know I mapped the place in detail, but I hoped people would mention >> what they would map without looking at the map :-) >> >> I stopped mapping house numbers ( I have collected more than 20.000 by >> hand according to Pascal Neis :-) ), as they are imported via CRAB at >> the moment and maybe later this year via a GRB import (with the >> buildings). >> That's why I turned to other stuff. >> >> I've heard pro's and con's for separate sidewalks & cycleways. I don't >> separate them as long as there is no physical barrier (hedge, guard >> rail, ditch,...) >> I'll try to map sidewalk=... or cycleway=... on the road though. >> >> I'll have a closer look at the TIA sign >> >> m. >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Checking on the map, learns me that most items are already thoroughly >> > mapped >> > (street cabinets, bins, advertising, lanes, crossings,...) >> > Things lacking, but not derivable from the photo are the division of >> > buildings and the corresponding addresses of the buildings. >> > IMO addresses are of more importance then the little street furniture >> > and >> > should get more priority in mapping. >> > Not meaning, that I don't appreciate these mappings, every added object >> > counts! >> > >> > When you have lot of time, you could also map the separated footwalk and >> > bicycle paths, but this is advanced stuff, and I don't recommend it, as >> > it >> > is not so easy to make a correct separation and have all options for >> > connections and resulting in no foot etc on the main highway itself, so >> > that >> > routing programs for bike and foot will always select the correct paths. >> > If >> > not done well, it makes more clutter then making things real or clear. >> > It seems these paths are already good and sufficient tagged in the map. >> > >> > So, in short, at first sight, not much extra to map from the photo. >> > (I assume the sign to TIA is simply a direction and not part of a >> > (tourist) >> > route, which would imply a missing relation for some bicycle >> > route/network) >> > >> > Regards, >> > Gerard. >> > >> > Marc Gemis wrote: >> > >> >> I wonder whether we could learn to see/map more by looking at each >> >> other's survey pictures. Would it allow novices to "see more" ? Let's >> >> try out >> >> I know the mailing list does not allow to include pictures, so you >> >> have to do it with a link >> >> >> >> What could/would you map when you look at [1] ? What would you >> >> investigate further ? >> >> >> >> Feel free to answer in French/German/English or Dutch >> >> >> >> p.s. Feel free to look at the other pictures at the site [2] and map >> >> anything you want :-) Under the picture you'll find a (i) which shows >> >> a map when you click it >> >> >> >> >> >> ---- Nederlands ---- >> >> >> >> Ik vraag me af of we van elkaar kunnen leren als we kijken naar de >> >> foto's die we maken tijdens een survey ? Zou het helpen om >> >> (beginnende) mappers meer te leren zien ? Laat ons het eens >> >> uitproberen. Jammer genoeg laat de mailing list niet toe om foto's toe >> >> te voegen, dus moet je het met een link stellen >> >> >> >> Wat zou je kunnen mappen, of wat map je gewoonlijk als je [1] bekijkt >> >> ? Wat zou je van nader bij gaan bekijken ? >> >> >> >> >> >> p.s. Het staat je vrij om naar de andere foto's op de site [2] te >> >> kijken en om het even wat te mappen dat je erop ziet :-) Onder de foto >> >> staat een (i), als je daarop klikt, zie je een kaartje. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> >> >> https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g/0/O/DSC_3228.jpg >> >> [2] gallery: >> >> https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Talk-be mailing list >> >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-be mailing list >> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:43:26 +0200 >> From: Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> >> To: OpenStreetMap Belgium <talk-be@openstreetmap.org> >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-be] What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? >> Message-ID: >> <CAJ6DwMAHmg1xwiRdS-WppwFYP7nypkw=r0wdmjx7pbuhvc7...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> They put that sign there, so I'd remember how to get to my aunt's house. >> She's Spanish... >> >> What about the buttons on the traffic lights? And in how much detail to >> map >> those traffic lights? >> >> Gerard, addresses are indeed important. Glenn needs beta testers for >> adding >> them from CRAB/AGIV. I'm rather busy with improving JOSM to map public >> transport, so I'm not getting around to it to test his work, but he's >> making great progress. >> Soon, it should become possible for everybody who uses JOSM to map those >> public transport routes and if they get broken by changes to the >> underlying >> infrastructure, to figure out how to fix them with as little effort as >> possible. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jo >> >> >> >> 2016-07-01 15:31 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: >> >> > I know I mapped the place in detail, but I hoped people would mention >> > what they would map without looking at the map :-) >> > >> > I stopped mapping house numbers ( I have collected more than 20.000 by >> > hand according to Pascal Neis :-) ), as they are imported via CRAB at >> > the moment and maybe later this year via a GRB import (with the >> > buildings). >> > That's why I turned to other stuff. >> > >> > I've heard pro's and con's for separate sidewalks & cycleways. I don't >> > separate them as long as there is no physical barrier (hedge, guard >> > rail, ditch,...) >> > I'll try to map sidewalk=... or cycleway=... on the road though. >> > >> > I'll have a closer look at the TIA sign >> > >> > m. >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu> wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Checking on the map, learns me that most items are already thoroughly >> > mapped >> > > (street cabinets, bins, advertising, lanes, crossings,...) >> > > Things lacking, but not derivable from the photo are the division of >> > > buildings and the corresponding addresses of the buildings. >> > > IMO addresses are of more importance then the little street furniture >> > > and >> > > should get more priority in mapping. >> > > Not meaning, that I don't appreciate these mappings, every added >> > > object >> > > counts! >> > > >> > > When you have lot of time, you could also map the separated footwalk >> > > and >> > > bicycle paths, but this is advanced stuff, and I don't recommend it, >> > > as >> > it >> > > is not so easy to make a correct separation and have all options for >> > > connections and resulting in no foot etc on the main highway itself, >> > > so >> > that >> > > routing programs for bike and foot will always select the correct >> > > paths. >> > If >> > > not done well, it makes more clutter then making things real or clear. >> > > It seems these paths are already good and sufficient tagged in the >> > > map. >> > > >> > > So, in short, at first sight, not much extra to map from the photo. >> > > (I assume the sign to TIA is simply a direction and not part of a >> > (tourist) >> > > route, which would imply a missing relation for some bicycle >> > route/network) >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Gerard. >> > > >> > > Marc Gemis wrote: >> > > >> > >> I wonder whether we could learn to see/map more by looking at each >> > >> other's survey pictures. Would it allow novices to "see more" ? Let's >> > >> try out >> > >> I know the mailing list does not allow to include pictures, so you >> > >> have to do it with a link >> > >> >> > >> What could/would you map when you look at [1] ? What would you >> > >> investigate further ? >> > >> >> > >> Feel free to answer in French/German/English or Dutch >> > >> >> > >> p.s. Feel free to look at the other pictures at the site [2] and map >> > >> anything you want :-) Under the picture you'll find a (i) which shows >> > >> a map when you click it >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> ---- Nederlands ---- >> > >> >> > >> Ik vraag me af of we van elkaar kunnen leren als we kijken naar de >> > >> foto's die we maken tijdens een survey ? Zou het helpen om >> > >> (beginnende) mappers meer te leren zien ? Laat ons het eens >> > >> uitproberen. Jammer genoeg laat de mailing list niet toe om foto's >> > >> toe >> > >> te voegen, dus moet je het met een link stellen >> > >> >> > >> Wat zou je kunnen mappen, of wat map je gewoonlijk als je [1] bekijkt >> > >> ? Wat zou je van nader bij gaan bekijken ? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> p.s. Het staat je vrij om naar de andere foto's op de site [2] te >> > >> kijken en om het even wat te mappen dat je erop ziet :-) Onder de >> > >> foto >> > >> staat een (i), als je daarop klikt, zie je een kaartje. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> [1] >> > >> >> > >> > https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g/0/O/DSC_3228.jpg >> > >> [2] gallery: >> > >> https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-06-09-Wilrijk/i-b8Xdd5g >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> Talk-be mailing list >> > >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Talk-be mailing list >> > > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-be mailing list >> > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160701/0f3e2b4a/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:49:37 +0200 >> From: Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> >> To: Jo Hannes <winfi...@gmail.com>, OpenStreetMap Belgium >> <talk-be@openstreetmap.org> >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-be] What could you map ? / Wat kan je mappen ? >> Message-ID: >> <cajkjx-rmxdp3oss51s9e5tw-iecdz8t5ej1ugasanj1aix7...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > What about the buttons on the traffic lights? And in how much detail to >> > map >> > those traffic lights? >> >> O, nice one ! >> According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing you could >> use "button_operated=yes" >> >> m >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of Talk-be Digest, Vol 103, Issue 2 >> *************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be