Yes, this is clearly a mistake caused by careless bulk imports or someone blindly copying information directly from the Villo! website because the text strings match.
When we see names such as "Station n° 312 CENTRE CULTUREL / CULTUREEL CENTRUM - BD DU SOUVERAIN FACE 282 / VORSTLAAN VOOR 282" we should change that and move the information into the appropriate keys: name (name=), address (addr:*=) and reference number (ref=). In recent weeks I have done some work and fixed most stations in the city centre already. It’s tricky because it is not only a tagging problem but quite often the nodes are not located correctly, so this requires proper surveying too. Doing the rest of the network is part of my personal to-do list, but if someone else is willing to contribute, any help is welcome. Cheers. Yves On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:47:28 +0100 Jakka <vdmfrank...@gmail.com> wrote: > What must be done here? finding the mapper ? or organisation? > The mapper puts into the "name" tag the adress...I thought adress are in > adress tag....for sure > example this node... See also the relation 271476 of the rentals... > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.83401997926138/4.457859929800588 > Are these the correct names or was it to show it on the maps...... > Have a nice day. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
