Le 31/05/2017 à 08:04, joost schouppe a écrit :
HI Thomas,
Thank you for taking this effort. For some it is extremely clear that
we can use SPW datasets, for others it is extremely clear we can not.
If the SPW are willing to officialise this, than we can step beyond
the doubt and the divisive discussions.
Since a few months, we have a membership and a board at OpenStreetMap
Belgium. Ben Abelshausen, Jonathan Belien and myself are on that
board. Ben is also our representative with Open Knowledge. So any of
us would be good if they want an "official representative". I would
definitely be willing to help out. I live near Brussels. Jonathan is a
real Bruxeleer, so it would be nice if we can meet there.
We can ask Dries at OpenKnowledge for a little help if SPW prefers
talking to them directly.
That's great! Vincent Bombaerts actually suggested that, though I
wasn't sure you'd be willing to.
I hope some people from the Walloon side can join too.
That said, I wonder if they really understand the implications of our
ODbL license. They can make a kind of contract with us, but that
implies that all the data we generate based on that contract are
exempt from the contract. If vector data would be included in such
arrangement, someone could theoretically import all that data into
OSM, after which anyone can use it for anything under the ODbL license.
That's exactly the kind of thing you'll be able to talk about.
However, I don't understand what vector data you talk about. From what I
know, the SPW data is in raster format, and it seems we can vectorize it
(trace).
And like André said, we don't copy the data, we consult it (= trace it
or what I meant by using it).
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
