Ground truth is only as precise as where they can manage to put up a sign though. I know a nearby case there a 3-point-border lies in the middle of an intersection between two secondary roads.
Overruling an existing border just because the sign may be off a bit, seems pushing it, no? Op di 21 mei 2019 om 17:56 schreef joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com >: > NGI data is not open as far as I'm aware. Cadastre is not accurate. You > could look at Statbel nis9 open data. And for Flanders there is the > "Voorlopig Referentiebestand Gemeentegrenzen", which is generally > considered the best quality (note how it's called "voorlopig" though). > So there is no single objective truth about where the borders are. As long > as this situation persists (and it's Belgium so there is little reason to > think this will be fixed soon), I don't see why OpenStreetMap should follow > any of these sources closely. As long as this persists, looking at the > different datasets (as well as some ground observations) with a human eye, > seems the best way forward to me. > > -- > Joost Schouppe > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
