Olá,
Essa foi a resposta que tive do Data Working Group a respeito do
problema nos mapeamentos do Eduardo Francis.
Desculpa a demora. Estou bastante ocupado nas últimas semanas e sem
tempo nem para ler direito as mensagens da lista.
O Paul disse que a solução não é reverter as edições, mas passar um
redaction bot sobre elas, apagando apenas as edições do Eduardo. Porém
como ele foi o primeiro editor da maioria dos dados, isso significa que
esses dados serão apagados.
O problema que vejo é que, apesar das edições terem sido feitas baseadas
em uma imagem de satélite sem autorização, as informações como nomes de
rua não foram obtidas indevidamente. Por isso, perguntei a ele se
realinhar os dados do mapa com a imagem do bing, resolveria a questão.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Old data based on Google imagery in Brazil
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:47:15 -0700
From: Paul Norman <[email protected]>
To: 'Wille' <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
From: Wille
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 7:30 PM
Subject: Old data based on Google imagery in Brazil
The user Eduardo Francis Batista[1] was one of the most active
contributors of OSM in Brazil [2]. Some days ago, the brazilian
community detected that the data the user put in the OSM database is
very similar with the data of TrackSource [3].
It's good to hear that the Brazilian community is watching for this.
We do know that isn't allowed the insertion of data based on google
satellite imagery. The problem is that a lot of people has made changes
in the map and, if we revert the editions of Eduardo, we will lose the
contributions of those people. I checked and now many of the cities
mapped by the user has bing aerial imagery. Can we solve the problem
just realigning the ways and areas with the bing imagery or the only
solution for this case is to revert the changesets of the user?
The right way to do this is not to revert or realign, but redact his
contributions like was done with decliners in the license change.
What the redaction bot does is split his contributions from other users.
For example, if some other user added an amenity=resturant node and then
Eduardo added a cuisine tag and moved the position than some other added
a name the redaction bot would move it back to its old location, remove
the cuisine tag and hide the old versions so they cannot be retrieved.
Is there any way to tell what data he contributed that needs to be
removed vs. anything original that isn't Google or TrackSource derived?
It's obviously best to save as much data as can be kept to minimize map
damage.
_______________________________________________
Talk-br mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
