this is great work, signs could be a bit smaller tough. why not stick with the symbol tag? see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging the symbols tagging should be transparent to the mappers not only to some internal notation of a renderer. and tags should be human readable. software can easily to the translation instead
On 12 Apr 2009, at 7:38 , Greg Troxel wrote: > > network=us_i_2 # Interstate (2 digit) us_i_3 for 3 digit > network=us_us_2 # US Route us_us_3 for 3 digit > network=us_ny # NY State Route > network=us_ny_county # > > That looks great to me, except that us_i_2 vs us_i_3 seems like > tagging > for the renderer, and something that would be easy for the renderer to > figure out. What about us_i and then have renderers find the right > shield for the number of digits? > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > talk...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
