The address range fields are shown in BC, but just not filled in like they are in Alberta. ... It isnt being used because we havent found a way to use it yet.
Hopefully, when i learn how to use geobase2osm, i'll have the answer. On 6/20/09, Michel Gilbert <michc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sam, > > I do not want to put you on a false track but I think the address ranges > are > not part of Canvev. I hope Guy will be able to confirm or please you. > > Cheers, > > Michel > > 2009/6/20 Sam Vekemans <acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com> > >> Would you know when it will be available in the CanVec data? >> >> Has anyone thought of how we can make use of the geobase address range >> data? >> Does anyone want an .osm file to be made that just has the 4 address >> range fields (and the proper source tags) made as i go through with >> canvec2osm? >> >> Cheers, >> Sam >> >> >> On 6/18/09, Bergeron, Guy <guy.berge...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca> wrote: >> > Just a heads up that the next NRN release for Ontario, schedule for >> > this >> > summer (around August), will include street names and address ranges >> > from closest to source NRN providers. >> > >> > Guy >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org >> > [mailto:talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Adam Glauser >> > Sent: 16 juin 2009 13:10 >> > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ontario 040P >> > >> > I've found (and since corrected) a couple more false-positive matches. >> > >> > Ways 35518380 was name="Old Oak Place", statscan:rbuid=3357619. These >> > tags should actually have been applied to way 35521248. The correct >> > tags for the first way are name="Aspenwood Place", >> > statscan:rbuid=3357613. >> > >> > Way 35502496 was name="Willow Wood Drive",statscan:rbuid=3357623. >> > Should be name="Woodrow Place",statscan:rbuid=3357623. This is tricky >> > in part due to one Statscan feature corresponding to two different >> > Geobase features (the entrance to the cul-de-sac and the >> > circle-with-middle-barrier part). >> > >> > I'll continue to report these unless I hear otherwise - I'm still new >> > here, if this is just noise please let me know. >> > >> > Also, thanks to Steve's pointers about OpenJUMP and the StatsCan road >> > name data, I've given names to a bunch of ways that Roadmatcher >> > couldn't >> > >> > resolve, along with their StatsCan RB_UIDs, using a combination of the >> > .shp file from the StatsCan website and local knowledge of the layout >> > of >> > >> > the roads. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-ca mailing list >> > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-ca mailing list >> > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > >> >> >> -- >> Twitter: @Acrosscanada >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > > > > -- > Michel Gilbert > -- Twitter: @Acrosscanada Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca