On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Bégin, Daniel <daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > You did not miss anything, you are giving comments on a sample - as expected! > > - About missing names, Canvec features are not named. However you can find > some toponyms. > - About missing tags on multipolygon. The tags have been placed at relation > level, not on inner or outer ways. > - About duplicate ways for water bodies. You have found a problem with the > Canvec product - support team has been advised. > - About out of date data - residential area, sports track, buildings. Here is > what I answered to Richard yesterday concerning building, it applies to your > findings ... > > "It reflects the fact that there is no more complete map update program at > federal level. The updated content is provided through the GeoBase > initiative. As buildings are not a GeoBase layer, they have not been updated > for a while. That is where Osm mapper could eventually make a difference."
Looks good, much better than my previous half-assed import attempts. There is a lot of out of date data in CanVec, especially in the buildings layer - e.g. old industrial buildings that were demolished ten years ago and replaced with new buildings. Please compare to Yahoo/survey before importing! _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
