I did a simple test of opening a file from 092G02 zip and hit Upload
in JOSM (didn't actually upload, of course). There's a bunch of
errors from the validator plugin. I think it'd be good to fix those in
the converter, otherwise it'll be a pain to resolve manually.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Adam Dunn <dunna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Opened up 092G06.
>
> highway=unclassified is misspelled. The 092G06 data has highway=unclasified
> (with one 's').
>
> footway bridges appear to be duplicated on top of the non-bridge footway
> that they are a part of. In other words, a [highway=footway] will continue
> the entire length of the path (including the bridge), and there is a second
> way [highway=footway;bridge=yes] where only the bridge is.
>
> cardinal direction modifiers have 3 spaces after them (eg. "West 8th
> Avenue"). I'm not sure what the standard is for OSM, since the wiki doesn't
> seem to talk about it.
>
> railway/road intersections don't have a common node. There is also a very
> long rail tunnel that runs from beside the Ironworkers Memorial Bridge down
> to near the intersection of Trans-Canada Highway and Willingdon Avenue, but
> this tunnel appears to be missing from Canvec.
>
> (as a side note: Canvec has the bridge for Trans-Canada going over Burrard
> Inlet called "Hwy 1;Second Narrows Bridge;Trans-Canada Highway;TransCanada
> Highway" {note the Second Narrows Bridge part}. It should actually be called
> "Ironworkers Memorial Second Narrows Crossing" and the rail bridge beside it
> is "Second Narrows Bridge". See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironworkers_Memorial_Second_Narrows_Crossing)
>
> Other data that I see in error is the standard "old source" problems
> (buildings that have since been constructed/demolished, especially in the
> rapid construction that happens at Univ. BC), streams/rivers not having
> names (but that was expected).
>
> It's nice to see that highway=*_link is being used. It was a pain trying to
> figure those out with NRN.
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Bégin, Daniel
>> <daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca> wrote:
>> > Bonjour!
>> >
>> > Before the Canvec.osm production starts, I have produced complete NTS
>> > datasets for samples previously offered - actually I have expanded the
>> > samples to cover the entire NTS tile and add 092G06.
>> >
>> > Each NTS dataset have been tiled using a quadtree algorithm - a nice
>> > example
>> > of the result is 092G06 ! The .osm subtiles are zipped all together.
>> > We
>> > are still using WinZip but we might eventually move to gzip or bzip.
>> >
>> > Have a look!
>> > And, by the way, can you make sure everything is still OK with the data?
>>
>> Wonderful news, Daniel! And congratulations.
>>
>> I'll take a look but am slightly {natural=wetland; wetland=swamp}ed,
>> right now. Is it helpful if I have a look next week?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
