On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Allison <andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com> wrote:
> I'm currently removing / replacing the data in the London area. I just had a look and London looks much better than last time I looked at it. Nice job! > How many mappers are there out there, that are recreating the currently > tainted map data? We see a few in this thread. In Canada, we're few and far between in general. The same will be true for remappers. We're determined too though. :-) > Right now I'm using the OSM inspector to flag what I have to replace. > If / Once the data is purged I would not know what needs to be done. Since we're talking about two accounts and v1 data, have a look in JOSM and use select-all, then look at the list of authors. If you see those two accounts in that list; that's data potentially effected. in London, there will likely be few objects. > As a side note, I was using the JOSM plugin to flag the tainted data. > But using the OSM inspector seems to flag a lot more data. Personally I > would like to know, which tool is a better indicator of what is going to > be removed. So, the inspector and the josm plugin use the same data. They should be equally-up-to-date. Make sure you have a recent josm and licensedetails plugin. There was a bug fix a week or two ago to help with data by anonymous accounts. _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca