> From: James A. Treacy [mailto:tre...@debian.org] > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Aboriginal Lands > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:37:17AM -0600, Tyler Gunn wrote: > > With wooded areas and lakes I've noticed we tend to just leave them > > un-merged. I can imagine for boundaries we'd like to have them > > merged, especially considering they'd be spanning many tiles. > > This begs the question: are there any reasons to merge areas like wooded > areas or lakes that are broken up? > Any reason NOT to merge them?
If you merge too many you end up with un-maintainable multipolygons that bog down the renderer. I merge lakes but not woods since in BC the woods never stop _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
