> From: Adam Dunn [mailto:dunna...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 5:57 PM > To: Steve Singer > Cc: Paul Norman; Toby Murray; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Disgardable NHN and NRN tags > > I'd keep the accuracy:meters around. I've used that for other things > (mainly denoting how accurate my gps is in obtaining geodetic survey > markers, or what the accuracy is based on number of sample points being > averaged). Wouldn't want JOSM to be wiping those out.
Why not accuracy instead? But ya, if you're using it then it'll need to be kept. > I think the ways tagged with sub_sea would need to be deleted, not just > the tag itself. These tend to be hydrological topology connectors > "under" lakes that show how rivers are connected. The entire way should > be deleted to bring it in line with the rest of OSM. Most of them need converting to waterway=stream (or other tags as appropriate) and sub_sea deleting. A lot of them are small ponds or streams where there would normally be a way. > Not too sure about the waterway:type tag. Might be used in other places > for other things? Taginfo shows only the imported values - I doubt anyone is using this. > Can't think of anything stopping us from getting rid of geobase:* tags. > Canvec imports don't have this, so it's inconsistent across the country, > and it's probably not used anywhere else. The ones I listed were from BC - are there others elsewhere that also need removing? _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca