Personally, I haven't imported anything with a geobase tag, but I will remove them if I edit a feature with one. Do they serve any purpose during the import process?
--G Sent from my iPhone On 2013-02-25, at 19:51, Bruno Remy <bremy.qc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Instead of a filter in an editor, why not a osm-bot doing this job? > > Just my two cents... > > Bruno Remy > > Le 2013-02-25 19:46, "Harald Kliems" <kli...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> Maybe it would make sense to come up with a consensus of which tags >> can be stripped. I know that for the US TIGER data JOSM automatically >> removes the cruft when you edit a way, and we should have this for >> Geobase/Canvec, too. >> Harald. >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: >> >> From: Andrew Allison [mailto:andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com] >> >> Subject: [Talk-ca] GeoBase tags >> >> >> >> Hello: >> >> >> >> Are the Geobase attribution tags relevant, should I leave them in >> >> or strip them out? >> > >> > There's no legal reason why you can't remove the attribution=* tags (or >> > any tag, for that matter). >> > >> > My practice is to remove them when the source=* tag indicates that the >> > source is geobase and I'm editing the way anyways. There may be other >> > import cruft that you want to strip out at the same time. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-ca mailing list >> > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> >> >> >> -- >> Please use encrypted communication whenever possible! >> Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
