I don't believe CanVec has any addressing info in metro Vancouver, so no conflict there.
I'd also hope that if people regard addresses as important they've been collecting them in surveys when out mapping, so there are address already there that should *not* generally be replaced by CanVec data. > From: Steve Roy [mailto:st...@ssni.ca] > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec 10 Data > > Agreed. I see that Paul Norman imported some of the City of Surrey GIS > data a couple of years ago and that included house numbers. > > Cheers > Steve > > On 04/11/2013 6:16 AM, Harald Kliems wrote: > > I think Daniel's email got cut off at the end :-) > > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Daniel Begin <jfd...@hotmail.com > > <mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I'm not familiar with imports using Potlatch but importing it > using > > JOSM is > > quite easy - open the file, select the features, copy then in a > new > > layer > > and then upload the layer in OSM... > > > > ...after you've carefully checked if everything is plausible and you > > don't mess up the work of other contributors who may already have > > added housenumber data of better quality. _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
