Mainly I am interested in the Quttinirpaaq national park. I think it is region 
120 and 340. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quttinirpaaq_National_Park

The Queen Maud Gulf Bird Sanctuary would be also nice. It is region 66N and 
66O. Center of it is Karak Lake N67.23719 W100.26031.

Why would it take years? The complete Canada topo map from Ibycus is "only" 
3,5GB big. 

Ivo



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andrew [mailto:andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. März 2014 17:16
An: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-ca] Nunavut has a very pour data coverage. Why not Integrate 
BNDT/CanVec dataset from Department of Natural Resources Canada?

Ivolino:

        I'm currently importing canvec data. Is there a specific area that you 
are interested in? I would expect all of Nunavut would take me  several years 
at least :-) Mind you I haven't looked at the data. Even Ellesmere island I 
would expect probably about a year.

http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/browse.do?produit=cded&decoupage=250k&map=canada



        Andrew

        aka
        PurpleMustang
        CanvecImports
        

On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 13:19 +0000, Pierre Béland wrote:
> What could be good is
> 
> 1. the physical layer infos + roads.
> 2. Complete the detail in villages with gps
> 
> 
>  
> Pierre
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> De : Adam Martin <s.adam.mar...@gmail.com> À : i...@gmx.com Cc : 
> talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 28 mars 2014 7h14 Objet 
> : Re: [Talk-ca] Nunavut has a very pour data coverage. Why not 
> Integrate BNDT/CanVec dataset from Department of Natural Resources 
> Canada?
> 
> 
> The CanVec data comes in layers, so it is definitely possible to 
> import only particular sections of the data, such as the roads.
> CanVec makes a good base to work off of. One of the seasoned importers 
> can do the work and us regular users can adjust it for the underlying 
> satellite data. I'd help with that part myself - always willing to 
> lend a hand.
> Adam
> On Mar 27, 2014 11:42 PM, <i...@gmx.com> wrote:
>         Would it be possible to only import the tundra parts? There
>         are no wood areas. Or just Ellesmere island? There are just
>         lakes and tundra. 
>          
>         Ivolino
>          
>          
>          
>         Von: Adam Martin [mailto:s.adam.mar...@gmail.com] 
>         Gesendet: Freitag, 28. März 2014 01:28
>         An: i...@gmx.com
>         Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>         Betreff: Re: [Talk-ca] Nunavut has a very pour data coverage.
>         Why not Integrate BNDT/CanVec dataset from Department of
>         Natural Resources Canada?
>          
>         I can see the point here - better to have something than
>         nothing. Still, my tendency would be to opt for a mapping
>         project like the ones performed on other areas rather than a
>         mass import. Imported data needs to be treated with kid gloves
>         as it is easy to end up with faulty information. Wood areas
>         tend to come in in a very haphazard way, for example.
>         Put out the call - I know there must be several willing to
>         help out up there. 
>         Adam
>         Hi all. 
>          
>         Nunavut has a very pour data coverage, almost nothing. Why not
>         integrate the BNDT (or NTDB) dataset from Department of
>         Natural Resources Canada?
>          
>         ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/bndt/
>          
>         I use the map data with the Ibycus Topo Canada v4 map for
>         Garmin and they are very good. I think the data are now
>         proceed from CanVec should be available for import in OSM. 
>          
>         http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canvec
>          
>         I would be very happy to have the topography maps from Nunavut
>         but I am afraid I am not experienced enough to import the
>         data. Because there is almost nothing so far you can’t do too
>         much wrongJ. 
>          
>         Greetings ivolino
>          
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Talk-ca mailing list
>         Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca



_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to