Would it be acceptable to mirror the Canvec data in the FTP site?  I'd
gladly put up the resources to serve up the data.

Darren Wiebe


>
> First, a short clarification – I do not know if Canvec will no longer
> (never again) be supplied in OSM format, I just know there are currently no
> resources allocated to work with the OSM community.
>
>
>
> Second, about the Canvec conversion scripts …
>
> -          They are owned by the crown – I would be surprised they
> could/would be released to the public;
>
> -          They were all developed with FME – a powerful tool – but you
> usually need to pay to get the appropriate licences…
>
>
>
> Third, concerning potential “diffs” files …
>
> -          There are some references to diffs files in talk-ca archives
> (some were even available for few NTS through ftp site)
>
> -          Maybe diffs files are available for Canvec? I do not know.
>
>
>
> Forth, my main concern is more about the sustained availability of the
> data in the ftp site L
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Davis [mailto:davis.christop...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* November-15-14 01:56
> *To:* Darren Wiebe
> *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Bringing canvec to OSM back to life
>
>
>
> I think it would be great to see newer CanVec data in OSM as well. BC's
> vegetation coverage from the last import in 2010 (tagged as
> "natural":"wood") is horribly patchy and quite ugly in the OSM basemap and
> other maps.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 14 November 2014 18:25, Darren Wiebe <dar...@aleph-com.net> wrote:
>
> I can only address point 4.  I'd love to see newer Canvec data.
>
>
>
> *Darren Wiebe*
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Andrew <andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello List:
>
>         Given Daniel's reply that Canvec will no longer be supplied in OSM
> format, I'm curious about:
>
> 1:      I don't know what I don't know to begin with :-)
> 2:      Are the scripts / programs available to do the conversion still
> available?
> 3:      Was there ever a program written to produce a "diffs" file?
> 4:      Is there a desire to have newer Canvec data converted to OSM?
>
>         Just throwing this out there.
>
>         Andrew
>         aka CanvecImports
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to