On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Mike Thompson <miketh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since no objection to removing "natural=water" from the Lake Superior relation has been expressed, I have removed it. I also amended the note on the relation asking that it not be added back in.
Huron, Michigan, and Erie all had the same issue (added at the same time by the same user) so I removed "natural=water" from those as well and added a similar note. Lake Ontario on the other hand is *only* mapped a water multipolygon (no coastline ways) so I've left it as-is for now. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Mike Thompson <miketh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think we are out of the woods yet. Overnight the NE end of Isle Royal became "flooded" at zoom level 13 This may also be due to outdated coastline shapefiles used by the standard tile layer (but I am not sure). The coastline data for Isle Royale looks good as processed in the latest daily files from < http://openstreetmapdata.com>. > Proposed Course of action. > [...] The proposed course of action for cleaning up the extra/incomplete Lake Superior relation seems good to me. AJ
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca