Je crois aussi qu'il serait mieux d'avoir divers projets. Cependant, il faut planifier avant d'ajouter de nouveaux projet et de demander aux bénévoles, de passer des heures à contribuer à de tels projets.
Pour motiver les contributeurs OSM à participer et maintenir la participation, Il est important de justifier la démarche, de déterminer ce qui sera vraiment utile en terme opérationnel pour supporter les équipes sur le terrain. Et de là, nous devons prioriser nos actions. En quoi sera utile ce travail, comment aidera-t-il au niveau opérationnel? immeubles ? adresses? etc La carte interactive de la ville de Wood Buffalo contient les données cadastrales, incluant les immeubles et les limites de chaque terrain cela pour Fort McMurray, Anzac, Gregoire Lake, etc. http://view.rmwb.ca/#!/ Espérons que système de backup est assuré pour toutes la base de données et le serveur de la municipalité! Infomatinos beaucoup plus précises et à date que ce que nous pouvons réaliser à partir d'imagerie Bing. Et des équipes spécialisées, incluant les compagnies d'assurance et les municipalités vont faire des évaluations au cours de prochaines semaines. La Croix-Rouge canadienne ne pourrait-elle pas simplement obtenir des infos directement des municipalités et de la Sécurité civile d'Alberta puisque celles-ci auront à coordonner ces évaluations? Les adresses sont sûrement des infos utiles pour les équipes qui se déplacent sur le terrain. Elles ne sont pas affichée sur la carte de Wood Buffulo. Pour ajouter les adresses, nous pourrions utiliser les données d'interpolation de Geobase. Plus simple et rapide. Mais encore là, y a-t-il des sources disponibles déja, et peut-être pour chaque immeuble? C'est sans doute ce que les équipes veulent avoir pour mieux se repérer. Les municipalités ont sans doute une base de donnée adresse géolocalisée et très précise. Pierre Pierre De : James <james2...@gmail.com> À : john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> Cc : Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com>; "talk-ca@openstreetmap.org" <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org> Envoyé le : lundi 9 mai 2016 18h30 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Fort McMurray forest fires I've created two other projects as per your suggestion as blocking tiles for something that is so small in terms of the whole picture doesn't make sense. For building outlines: http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/22 For addresses and residential polygons: http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/23 For validation(QA): http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/24 On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:45 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: I mean how do we decide a tile is mapped? Normally in HOT its when the list of things in the instructions are completed. " Also trace - Routes in the region - Polygons around the residential areas in areas around Fort McMurray - Isolated buildings outside urban places - Names of missing roads - Addresses (via geobase) Check Addresses are valid with GeoFabrik inspector tool"That's quite a lot for a tile, mapping buildings is one process, adding addresses is another, checking the addresses is yet another.Based on HOT experience its best to keep it fairly simple. So I suggest:First project tile and map buildings. This is a fairly simple task that a beginner with the JOSM building tool can do fairly well. Second project tile and add addresses. This is more complex. Third project tile GeoFabrick inspector tool. This is even more complex. You can have more than one set of tiles gridding the area. Cheerio John On 9 May 2016 at 17:36, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: Bing imagery is better than mapbox in that region. For addressing do you mean building by building or CanVec interpolation?On May 9, 2016 5:11 PM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: Should we layer this ie one project to map the buildings, another to add addresses, the processes are quite different and at the moment its difficult to say a tile is done for buildings when the address info hasn't been added and that means mappers going over the same tiles multiple times. Are we using Mapbox imagery or Bing for this one by the way? Thanks John On 9 May 2016 at 16:11, Kunce, Dale <dale.ku...@redcross.org> wrote: If we can get good pre-event imagery and do the building by building assessment I don’t think we will need post-event imagery but I can be on the lookout for it. Dale — Dale Kunce | Senior Geospatial Engineer and GIS Team Lead | International Services | American Red Cross 2025 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20006 Tel 202.303.4095 | Cell 510.842.7523 | Skype dkunce On 5/9/16, 4:08 PM, "Paul Norman" <penor...@mac.com> wrote: >On 5/9/2016 12:43 PM, Kunce, Dale wrote: >> Bernie, >> I do see that the building footprints are in the esri basemap >> unfortunately this doesn’t actually help. The esri basemap data is >> just an tiled image and does not provide us with the vector data that >> we need to complete our work. I’m happy to take the lead and >> coordinate the mapping. The existing Bing imagery is good enough for >> our needs for tracing. >> > >Any hope of getting post-event imagery, which will allow us to avoid >mapping buildings which no longer exist and shouldn't be in OSM? > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-ca mailing list >Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca -- 外に遊びに行こう！ _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
