I've read it in the past, I do agree cavec is not 100% accurate, but in areas with absolutely nothing, it is better than a blank map: which is useless.
On Aug 31, 2016 6:02 PM, "dega" <gade...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi everybody! On 2016-08-31 Stewart C. Russell wrote: > A paper published in the last couple of years (by Anita Graser, maybe?) > showed that CanVec imports were the largest source of spurious precision > in the entire OSM database. If somebody has a link to that document, I would like to get it. Thanks! dega _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
