I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON Good catch!
*~~~~~~* *Denis Carriere* *GIS Software & Systems Specialist* *Twitter: @DenisCarriere <https://twitter.com/DenisCarriere/>* *OSM: DenisCarriere <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DenisCarriere>* GitHub: DenisCarriere <https://github.com/DenisCarriere> Email: carriere.de...@gmail.com On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that > there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual > hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered > deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is > used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on > that. > > We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without > consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can > we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together? > It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario. > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format - > it has a Canada example! > > Martijn van Exel > http://mvexel.github.io/ > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
