I didn't even go look at the edit. I've seen so many fake parks lately I just automatically assumed the worst. My apologies to Denis001 for assuming it was related to Pokemon.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > seeing as it was back in 2015, PoGo didn't exist back then, I think it was > just a mistake. > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> > wrote: > >> It's possible Denis001 edit is an effort to "game" Pokemon. I would >> recommend fixing the edit and send them a nicely worded welcome message >> with help in how to edit. I provide new users with a link to this blog on >> editing for Pokemon, https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips- >> pokemon-go/ >> >> Clifford >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:05 PM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I've noticed something going on in the map: >>> http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1944638 >>> >>> Denis001 has added leisure=park to a Canvec forest and a Lake's name. >>> I'm pretty sure that he ment to add it to the lake itself and not the >>> forest relation. Just wondering what you think? Should I remove >>> leisure=park and the name tag? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-ca mailing list >>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> @osm_seattle >> osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us >> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch >> > > > > -- > 外に遊びに行こう! > -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca